Is There No Freedom in Science?

How USRTK is the Big Tobacco of the 21st Century

In 1839, in the historical play Cardinal Richelieu, playwright Edward Bulwer-Lytton wrote that ‘the pen is mightier than the sword’. Since 2014, in both the US and Canada, the pen has been progressively attacked by the sword. Academic freedoms of biotech researchers have been attacked by an organization known as the US Right to Know (USRTK).

The USRTK is a US shell organization (funded by over $400,000 per year from the organic industry) created to attack academic research on the benefits of biotechnology and GM crops. This organization works to attack, discredit and scare academics. So far 40+ academics have been publicly accused of being corrupted by the biotech industry. Along with these accusations, the USRTK has also demanded access to their work email in attempts to discredit said academics and researchers.

Big Tobacco Approach

The USRTK has adopted a method used by the big tobacco companies to establish distrust in scientists. In their book Merchants of Doubt, authors Oreskes and Conway thoroughly identify how the tobacco industry organized targeted criticisms of the American Surgeon General and scientists that reported the health dangers of smoking. Tobacco companies in the 1960s funded shell organizations to refute the research on the dangers of smoking. In addition, these organizations attempted to tarnish the reputations of the authors (scientists and academics) of this research.

Like big tobacco, USRTK (or perhaps big organic) has adopted the strategy of ‘killing the messenger’. By attacking academics researching the impacts and benefits of GM crops, USRTK is creating a negative environment and trying to scare the academic community to step back from future involvement on this research area. This is an issue, as it threatens the freedoms of academics to probe, explore and research the good and the bad of the leading issues of the day.

US Right to Know tries to silence scienceAccusational Sword

Using an actual sword today is rather passé! Instead, the USRTK sword is access to email requests, used to damage the reputation of highly respected and credible academics. In its latest sword thrust, the USRTK has launched an attack on the University of Saskatchewan, by accusing Distinguished Professor Peter Phillips and myself. In my case, hundreds of hours of will be spent sifting through all of my emails, time that I could better spend mentoring students or working on important agricultural projects such as those in developing countries.

Led by Gary Ruskin, it seems that the USRTK firmly believe that academic freedoms should not exist in our present day society. Instead, they would prefer that special interest groups (like organic companies) dictate what research should be allowed to be conducted by academics. There’s no honour in riding their steeds into university offices, wave their swords around and terrifying those who follow academic professionalism in GM crop research. Such campaigns of fear and intimidation have failed countless times throughout history and I hope it indeed fails again.

While frustrating, to say the least, the ‘Big Tobacco’ strategy that the USRTK is employing doesn’t work. It didn’t work for the large tobacco companies in the 1960s and 1970s as most of them were sued for the health problems caused by their product. Ruskin and the organic industry are terrified that the message about the health and environmental benefits from GM crops is gaining acceptance by the public and are mounting up, swords in hand to strike fear into the hearts of those of us that undertake this research.

It would appear that Bulwer-Lytton’s words are as true today as they were 180 years ago. There’s strong evidence that the academic pen is indeed mightier than Ruskin’s USRTK organic sword.          

2 Comments

  1. Kathleen Solose

    This is ridiculous! Who is working for “Big Tobacco? It is you who advocates for “Big Food” and their insidious methods of operation. You should be the scientists exposing the risks of chemicals and genetic mutations to human health. What a preposterous argument! Watch out, you know what happened to “Big Tobacco”!

    1. Thanks for the comment. I have reviewed the regulation development process and believe it is a thorough risk assessment process. Genes change every time a new plant is created. Organic crops are developed via chemical and radiation mutation, which mutates roughly 20,000 genes per new plant variety. Organic varieties are not reviewed for safety by any regulatory agency. GM varieties change a handful of genes at one time, with precision and are the most regulated crops on the market. My research examines the sustainable aspects of agricultural innovations, with the main one being GM crops. I survey farmers to learn what changes have occurred in their farming practices. For this, the organic industry and the US Right to Know is attacking me. This is exactly the same as what the big tobacco industry did to scientists who published research indicating that smoking caused cancer. Only now, the big organic industry is attacking scientists who say there are benefits from GM crops.

Leave a Reply