Food

Truth of Non-GMO Label Advertising

Share

How Science is Winning Consumers Back

For those that live near the oceans, they know that the tide can only go in one direction for so long, before making the turn back. The same can be said for many things in society, as is witnessed by certain crazes such as beanie babies or fidget spinner, soon too will the tide turn on taking selfies and slime. Crazes or fads are common in our social activities, and we see them occurring in the products we purchase, and some of us may remember trying to buy that one certain children’s gift at Christmas having to go to numerous stores before being successful. This same craze situation has always has its place in the labeling of food products. Currently, a certain butterfly label is riding the tide of consumers, but how far is that tide from shore?

Getting beached

Verified Non-GMO Project’s labeling fads has recently suffered a tremendous blow to its self-inflated prestige. In May, over the span of a week, two large food companies stuck pins into the Non-GMO Project’s balloon! On May 16th, Betty Crocker Foods tweeted the following tweet, boldly stating that “GMOs are safe”, which has been verified by the World Health Organization and the United States Food and Drug Agency.

A mere 6 days later, on May 22nd, another hit to the Non-GMO Project came when Clover Leaf Seafood announced they would be removing the Verified Non-GMO Project’s label from their canned tuna. It looks like the seafood company saw the tide about to turn and didn’t want to get beached ashore with the butterfly label.

To have two publically recognized and trusted food brands publicly dismiss the Non-GMO Project’s labelling gimmick in the span of less than a week, certainly is indicative of the tide beginning to turn.

It’s time to Free the Butterfly

The Verified Non-GMO Project has never been able to claim or prove that the addition of their label makes the food products with their label any safer. The Canadian regulatory agency responsible for food safety essentially has publicly state that the Verified Non-GMO Project’s label is simply a marketing scam. The lead regulatory agency in one of the two countries the Non-GMO Project operates announced that the inclusion of their butterfly logo is simply a consumer marketing fad, as there is absolutely no ability of the label to indicate a product is any safer because of the logo.

The tide is turning and this is indeed good news for all of us consumers. I’m a fan of nature and the multitude of flowers that exist in it, and that’s where the butterflies belong, not on food labels.

Stuart Smyth

Dr. Stuart Smyth, is a Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, at the University of Saskatchewan for over a decade. He previously held the Agri-Food Innovation and Sustainability Enhancement Chair & is the vision behind SAIFood.

Recent Posts

Canadian Agriculture: Struggling to Grow or Struggling to be Recognized (Part 2)

Part 2 This second post to the series on agricultural productivity in Canada dives into… Read More

06/09/2026

We Let our Horse Racing Industry Go

The Role of Economics in Canadian Track Closures It’s horse racing season. Rather, for Canadians, it should be. Despite being one… Read More

06/04/2026

Gene Editing for Food Security

The following article was originally posted by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) on May 14,… Read More

06/02/2026

Does it Make Affordability Cents? What Manitoba’s PST Removal says about Food Security

I don’t know about you, but I am desensitized to sales tax. Between goods and… Read More

05/26/2026

Germinate x GrasspeaNet via GROW-Grasspea

Connecting Data, People, and Purpose Why Grasspea Matters Grasspea is one of the world's most… Read More

05/21/2026